Showing posts with label Republicans suck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republicans suck. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 31, 2024

The Highwayman Returns...With A New Cartoon Series: "Vergogna!" (Takes I-IV)

<Take I>
 
It's been awhile since our favorite cartoonist, The Highwayman, has been heard from around these parts...but when he sent these over flying over the transom, here at Ramen Noodle Nation, I figured, we had to get on our hands on them, and run them

This series of cartoons, of course, refers to the scandal that surfaced around Supreme/Extreme Court "Justice" Sam Alito and Martha-Ann, his combative, rabidly pro-Trump spouse, who couldn't keep those instincts in check -- as she sparred with her neighbor's rainbow-friendly flag, hence, her freewheeling use of the Italian word for "shame". Which, as you'll see, means something a bit different in this context, right?

<Take II>

When I asked The Highwayman, "But isn't this old news by now?", he responded: "Not if you care about what happens when power gets wrapped up in a politically toxic cocktail of naked self-interest.

"What made the whole business notable, for me -- aside from Martha Alito's comically pugilistic streak, which is extreme, even for that bunch -- is the sheer thin-skinned nature of these high-profile, powerful people, who always seem to want it both ways.

"They want us to relentlessly adore them, and preserve them in amber from any sort of criticism, even as they see nothing wrong with injecting their real attitudes into rulings that seem designed to strip people of more and more rights.


<Take III>

For good measure, the Highwayman added: "It's an ethic of subordination and domination, one that their so-called 'originalist' view has no problem unleashing -- to which I respond with Abraham Lincoln's celebrated truism: 'Public sentiment is everything.' One way or another...our time is coming!"

To which I could only respond: "Fair enough!" And so, here comes this latest salvo. Ponder the images, read the links, and ask yourselves the relevant questions, starting with the million dollar one: "Should be people who hold so much power be allowed to mix personal business and pleasure, to such a self-aggrandizing extent?" 

And, last but not least, this question from Lauren Windsor (see Politico link): Is it a bigger ethics problem for me to pretend like I’m a fangirl, or is it a bigger ethics problem for them to accept millions of dollars of undisclosed gifts from GOP donors? Obviously this is what I believe, but maybe the media and others — instead of pearl-clutching — should be trying to get more answers from the court and more accountability."

Food for thought, as they say, isn't it?--The Reckoner

<Take IV>


Links To Go (For Shame -- Indeed:)

CNN: Hear Secret Recording 
Of Martha Alito Discussing Flag Controversy:

Politico.com: Alito's Wife Shocked 
Even The Activist Who Secretly Recorded Her:
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/06/11/alito-recording-undercover-interview-00162808


Sunday, December 15, 2024

"Just Give Us Money, Folks": Rethinking A Timeworn Democratic Tactic (UPDATED: 1/14/25)

 

<Exhibit A, of what Kamala Harris's campaign missed most:
https://www.downwithtyranny.com>

<i.>
Not long ago, the Squawker and I found ourselves entering a classic conversation, while we were driving around, doing our usual steady diet of mindless errands. We actually find ourselves revisiting this conversation a lot lately, one that applies to this latest election spectacle, too. The dialogue went like this:

The Squawker: Boy, I thought we'd have moved out by now. It's so hard to make friends around here.

The Reckoner: Don't forget how busy they are, or so they tell you. The way they talk, you'd think they were CEOs of some company...

Squawker: Well, some of them are CEOs! And even if they're not, they're all these older Boomers. This town is crawling with them! They have endless money, and they're always going on trips, to some foreign country, or other. I can't take it anymore, I hate it here! 

Reckoner: It was like that here when I grew up. Can't say I've got a mile long invite list going, either. Still, though, you might well ask yourself this...

Squawker: What's that, exactly?

Reckoner: Here's the thing about friends, however you find them. What would you do with them, once you had them?

Squawker: What do you mean by that?

Reckoner: That's the thing, isn't it? Friendships take work to maintain, like marriages, or any other relationship. But most folks don't think about that --

Squawker: Until it's too late. I got it. (sighs) Well, I sure hope that isn't me.


<Kamala Harris, surrounded
by ghosts of Democratic Presidencies past:
How much longer will we hear the mantra,
"Just tinker 'round the edges, tinker 'round the edges?":
https://www.downwithtyranny.com>

<ii.>
Our conversation seems especially appropriate, in light of the train wreck that greeted last month's election result, followed by the existential dread that only a Trump restoration can uncork. in true 20-megaton style. It was as though 2020 had never happened, let alone, the biggest takeaway from the COVID programs that followed Trump's defeat -- give people enough resources, and they'll get the job done.

No such luck, as we gird for 2025. Now that all those programs -- the child tax credit, the COVID relief checks, the temporary eviction moratoriums -- have been unceremoniously halted, it's back to choosing between food and medicine, rent and medical bills, car repairs and daycare, or whatever millions of us were grappling with, before the pandemic hit.

For a nation that never stops prattling about the beauty of "choice," what's striking is how few meaningful options are ever offered on the menu. Given how so many are struggling, stranded by a system that's rendered most basic needs -- from energy, to food, housing, and back again -- as exercises in circle-the-drain frustration, what's the most important takeaway, for the Democratic Party?

Five words, it seems, judging by the emails that began flooding my inbox, with the ink barely cold on Harris's defeat: "Just give us money, folks." Hence, this arid opening nugget, blasted out from some entity or other calling itself the Harris Fight Fund (*11/14): "The results in the presidential election weren't something any of us had hoped for."

Quite. Indeed. Do tell. You think? Insert the snark of your choice here. Whatever you conjure up will suffice. Then comes the pitch: 

"So, now our job goes to electing these final members of Congress who will keep Trump in check these next four years. That will take resources. There will be legal challenges and recounts.

"And just like in our campaign, the vast majority of donations we receive to support the Harris Fight Fund program will come from small-dollar donations from people like you looking for something meaningful and important to channel your emotions toward.

"If everyone getting this email donated right now, we'd have what we need to finish the job in these races. But not everyone will give, so we’re urgently asking people who understand how important it is to win these races to contribute today."

How much, then? Fifty bucks, in this case. Still, the underlying assumptions behind this email seemed odd, since the Republicans had already won the Senate, and the House of Representatives' overall makeup remained uncertain, though still tilted towards the GOP. All of which naturally begs the question,
"How much bang will those 50 bucks buy?" Not much, it seems, unless you're a sucker for knife-edged stalemate.


<https://www.downwithtyranny.com>

<iii.>
Evidently, Team Harris's hopes for a brighter post-defeat future hadn't panned out -- at least, that's what a follow-up email (11/21/24) suggested, complete with a chart, highlighting a less than rosy turn of events on the donation front: "You can see the rise as we launched and the drop-off that happened after that. Not great."

That hardly seems surprising, considering how Harris stacked up (74.9 million votes) against her predecessor, Joe Biden (81.2 million votes). Even so, "we are counting on people like you who understand the stakes of holding Trump accountable to get it done," this email hopefully suggested. "Because if we don't have the resources to do so, we won't. It'll be another four years of chaos and confusion. It's honestly that simple."

What's the big takeaway here? That, if I don't kick in the anticipated fifty bucks, Project 2025's dystopian hellscape is all but assured? Apparently so, because the very next day (11/22/24) brought this salvo, from the Harris Fight Fund ("please don't click away"):

Donald Trump is on a mission to bring our country back to a time when we had fewer rights and freedoms than we do today. He is going on a hiring spree appointing loyalists who will do his bidding like RFK Jr.

If everyone reading this message donated even $10, we would not only have a huge number of donations, but we would have the resources to begin holding Trump accountable.


That same day brought yet another plea for funds ("we set a big goal to get our fight fund program off the ground, but the truth is, we’re not on track to hit it"), followed by the same pitch for that 50 bucks, to stop Trump ("We need every member of this team to step up and make sure he knows we won't back down"), and then, the close ("This is one of our most critical fundraising moments, so can you donate $50 for the first time today?").



<2025 Word cloud: Just a bad dream, 
or the shape of things to come?:
Citizens For Responsible Ethics In Washington>

<iv.>
Other organizations seem to have cribbed from the same notebook, such as Voters Not Politicians (VNP). The group is best known for helping to spearhead Proposal 2's passage in 2018, which led to the creation of an independent commission to oversee Michigan's redistricting process.

Like Team Harris's blizzard of fundraising pitches, VNP's morning-after email (11/7/24) starts off on the same unintentional note of understatement:


"I’ll start by saying that the results from Tuesday's election certainly were not what many of us who champion democracy would have hoped for."

Hmm. Really? In any event, VNP also doesn't believe in letting the grass grow under its feet, as the next two paragraphs make plain:

"We are happy to have helped secure wins for Michigan Supreme Court candidates Kimberly Thomas and Kyra Harris-Bolden. But still, the presidential results and the loss of the pro-voter majority in the Michigan House of Representatives are casting a heavy shadow. 

"There will be a lot of analysis in the coming days, weeks, and months, but one thing that’s clear is that democracy is going to need defending, and that's what we do best."

The closing paragraph of the next email, blasted out two days later, is even less subtle, if you consider the self-serving nature of the pitch:
"If you're looking for a place to channel your activism right now, please consider making a contribution to our people-powered movement that is working to defend democracy from election deniers and the dangerous promises made in Project 2025."

Still, re-electing Harris-Bolden and Thomas is a big win against the not-so-shadowy, far right interests who hoped to unseat them. As a result, Michigan voters have suffered far less, compared to other Democratic-led states that lack high court majorities. (Ask Wisconsin's Governor Tony Evers how well that situation works for him.)

And yes, losing the House majority isn't ideal, but at least our high court will likely check whatever power grabs the Republicans dream up. We'll see how much of their originalist fever holds, once those losses start coming to them. The moral of the story? If you show up and vote, you've still got a chance. If you stay home, next time, you may not be so lucky.



<"Ghosts Of Democratic Presidencies Past"/
Take II: The Reckoner

“No space of regret can make amends
for one life's opportunity misused...”
Charles Dickens: "A Christmas Carol">

<v.>
Even so, it feels troubling when you're hearing from an organization like the Democratic Party only when it wants something, whether it's your vote, or your money. Though both items are essential building blocks of politics, they're not the be-all and end-all, either, nor should anyone accept them as such.

That's because, first and foremost, politics is a relationship business. The best -- and worst -- politicos instinctively grasp this principle, when it comes to getting things done. We're all more likely to go the limit for someone who's demonstrated the same quality, even if it's only symbolically. Makes sense, right?

Team Harris seemed to instinctively grasp this principle. Or so it seemed, until a different picture emerged, via media reports of its alleged $20 million campaign debt. The figure included $15 million for "event production," $4 million for private jets, and $1 million paid to Oprah Winfrey's production company. What's more, the Harris-Walz campaign blew through some $1.5 billion in four months -- a mind-blowing figure, when you consider how much it underperformed with all its key constituencies.

Not surprisingly, it's a development that's generated tidal waves of ill will within Democratic Party circles. Democratic megadonor John Morgan's widely quoted statement probably ranks among the more printable responses: "I think this disqualifies her forever. If you can't run a campaign, you can't run America." Naturally, Team Harris disputes the estimate, though it's yielded one net positive -- by the first week in December, all the email begging had finally stopped.

The moral? It's not how much you spend, but where you spend it, that matters. As much as Harris hoped to distance herself from memories of Hillary Clinton's losing run in 2016, both campaigns shared two ironic qualities in common -- a fetish for high-gloss. feelgood-type events, coupled with a heavy reliance on traditional media, and paid advertising. 

All the emphasis on aging superstars -- from Beyonce, to The Boss, and beyond -- proved no match for the GOP's noise machine. Unless you count Bluesky, and MSNBC, there is no obvious Democratic counterweight to the likes of FOX News, Joe Rogan, and a social disinformation space that never rests. Without one, the climb back to contention will prove painful, prolonged, and difficult -- especially when donors remain so stuck on Star Trek
-style social engineering schemes.



<https://www.downwithtyranny.com>

<Coda>
Even if little appetite exists for creating a Democratic answer to FOX, it's worth remembering how many organizations, large and small, could really use the funding. The fateful priority shift that took hold during the early '90s -- chasing the tech money, to erase the traditional Republican advantage in fundraising -- has proven catastrophic, in more ways than one.

Cool beans, maaan! 

Look at the gadgets that all these crazy techo bros keep cranking out for us!  They're just big kids at heart, only with lots of money!

Who doesn't want some of that? Besides, hoovering up all those little guys' cash is sooo muuuchhh wooorrrkkk, man. Why do that?

I remember all the rhapsodies that accompanied this strategic shift -- about the "information economy," and all those "wired workers" who couldn't help but prosper, because they were going to be so busy "connecting," and "sharing," who'd ever have time for anything else?

How anybody would ever earn any money -- because all this "sharing" was supposed to happen for free, remember -- seemed elusive, but looking back, it made all those debt-raddled slacker kids feel like big shots. And if it's that what it took to fool them, then that was enough.

Little did we know, of course -- or should I say, little did the Democratic Party leaders of the time care, from Senator Charles Schumer, to former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and her sidekick, James Clyburn (imagine a more lethally careerist Sancho Panza, to an OTT Don Quixote) -- that these tech bros turned out to be feral turds, whose deeply-held beliefs seem slightly inclined to the right of Attila the Hun, Adolf Hitler, and Louis XIV, combined.

And guess what? Their every waking moments are driven by two of man's most malignant impulses. First, to squeeze as much money from as many as possible, in as short a time as possible. Second, bending the world to their will, by any means necessary, to coin a phrase In polite circles, it's called the march of progress; in less polite ones, psychopathy. LIke great white sharks, they show an alarming lack of interest in sleep.

And, for those still bothering to keep score of such things, the chickens just won't stop coming to roost. Or so it seems, anyhow. But, if any of the Democratic National Committee's dinosaur hierarchy actually are taking notes, a few lessons seem worth repeating, and underscoring. Therefore, once more, with feeling:

Point #1: A relationship based solely on how much money some-entity-or other hopes to extract from you, isn't one that's built to last.

Point #2: When the rank and file suggest, "We really would appreciate something/someone else than the ding-dong nominees/policies you're serving up," it pays to heed the popular outcry.

Point #3: An ally who doesn't share your vision, and throws in their lot for convenience's sake with you, isn't one. And relying on them is a dangerous strategy. In fact, it's like having no strategy at all.

Point #4: Those who don't learn from the past are condemned to repeat it. Those who don't read the room are doomed to play empty houses.

But this is the trouble with friends, as I've already suggested. What will you do with them, once you have them? And, assuming they turn up, how well does the Democratic hierarchy read the room? We'll know, soon enough. -- The Reckoner

PS I know this essay is long enough already, but I just happened to stumble across a couple of observations from James Zogby, a longtime DNC member who's critical of its practices. His recent comments, aired on "Breaking Points," make the case for the prosecution quite well:

"I grew up, my mom was a precinct captain and I used to go door to door with her, and go to Ward meetings, and on Election Day we'd get poll cards and we'd go to the polls and pass them out. You belonged to something, and you felt like this was part of who you were. "That's no longer the case. Being a member of the Democratic Party means nothing more than: I'm on a email list, I'm on a text message list, I'm on a hard mail list, I'm on a phone list, and I get asked for money. Nobody asks my opinion. There is no way to record your feeling about an issue."
Well-said, and well-stated, but evidently, not enough to force failures who fell upwards in previous administrations to start clearing their throats, and insist that they've earned the promotion -- such as Rahm Emanuel, Obama's former chief of staff, the same strategic genius who notoriously insisted, "I don't give a f#uck about filling federal judgeships." We all know who did, and how that movie played out, and how well it worked for the Democrats, right? I'm not sure if Rahm's trial balloon is terribly serious, as the smart money seems to be on Wisconsin party chair Ben Wikler, the only candidate to earn a major nod -- in this case, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer -- in the run-up to next month's DNC leadership election. We'll see soon enough, I suppose, how much they've learned from their recent misfortunes. PPS (UPDATE: 1/14/25): Or, maybe I spoke too soon. Look what arrived in my mailbox, yesterday, and it's from -- you guessed it -- the "Harris Fight Fund":

"Last Monday afternoon, I did what I have done my entire career—honor the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. That includes ensuring the people of America have their votes counted, that those votes mattered, and that they determined the outcome of an election.

"America's democracy is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it.

"Every single person. That includes me, and you.

"And today, I am asking you to stay in that fight, and to do something important — especially as Republicans take control of Congress and in less than one week, the White House.

"Please make a contribution to the Democratic National Committee. Give $5, $50...whatever you can afford. A strong Democratic Party has never been more important than it is right now -- and that's only possible together."

“Men's courses will foreshadow certain ends, to which, 
if persevered in, they must lead," said Scrooge. "But if the courses be departed from, the ends will change.”

>"A Christmas Carol"<

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

One Picture, A Thousand Words (Take IV): Some Last Blasts From The Home Stretch

 <Kamala Harris Continues Making Her Case...>



<A Harris flyer with a specific mission, namely, give the last-minute voters whatever nudge they still need, to get to the polls -- and, of course, cast their ballot for her. All the necessary details are right upfront (above), with the final kicker of encouragement on the back (below).

As strange as it sounds, there are still people out there who haven't committed themselves either way, as they wrestle with the various issues preoccupying them -- the cost of living, the slaughter in Gaza, whether Harris can muster the necessary juice to capitalize on her campaign promises, and so on.

As one comic (whose name escapes me) said, on "The Daily Show," "What could there possibly left to find out about these people, how they stack the inside of a dishwasher?" But I honestly wouldn't dog people who identify that way -- when it comes to politics, we all have varying levels of comfort, and/or discomfort. Everyone has to decide what level they can live with, in their mind.>


====================================================================================================================================================

<Michigan Supreme Court, Reproductive Rights>


<Nowhere has the Democratic ground game seemingly invested more effort on any issue than -- surprise, surprise -- abortion, which paid such dividends in the 2022 midterms after the infamous Dobbs decision. 

The pundits, as they often do, seem dismissive of a repeat, but the comments that I've read -- of articles focusing on uncommitted and undecided voters -- lead me to think otherwise.

After all, images of Republican-leaning women getting just as queasy as their Democratic counterparts about the idea of an America committing itself to forced birth don't seem that much of a stretch, right? In any event, this mailer showcases Harris's efforts to link herself with reproductive rights, via Michigan's Supreme Court candidates who embrace them, while throwing plenty of shade on their counterparts (O'Grady, Fink).>


====================================================================================================================================================


<Example of another mailer, this one making a more explicit connection between the Republican nominees for the Michigan Supreme Court, and their counterparts on the national stage (Mike Rogers, Donald Trump). The implication here is obvious ("They're all on the same team, so -- AVOID!")>



====================================================================================================================================================


<State Representative (38th District):
One Positive, One Negative Snapshot>



<Example of a more upbeat flyer from Democratic State Representative Joey Andrews, complete with the obligatory family shot (above), followed by a quick rundown of his more relevant policy stances on the rear (below). What a contrast this effort makes from the one that follows, as you'll see...>


====================================================================================================================================================


<Once again, this mailer hammers Andrews's Republic opponent, South Haven area money manager Kevin Whiteford, for taking an overly punitive stance against abortion, and -- as the other bullet points suggest -- a bit too much enthusiasm for other aspects of his party's program. Add a photo made to look distinctly unflattering, and you're good to go, or so it seems. Another snapshot of how national issues find expression at the down ballot level.>



====================================================================================================================================================

<Jill Stein Returns For An Encore>


<For all the fuss made over third party candidates this year, it seems fair to say they haven't made much noise, presumably due to so many locking in with the major party nominees (Harris, Trump), and a conscious desire, perhaps, to avoid the fallout of 2016 -- when some blamed Stein, the Green Party's nominee, for helping to siphon enough votes from Hillary Clinton, enabling Trump to slither across the finish line.

This time around, like her cohorts (Cornel West, Oliver Chase), Stein's return is playing out to a more muted response, while RFK Jr. is faring slightly better, due to his full-throated support of Trump (having dropped out, where else could he go, right?).

How much drawing power Stein still commands remains to be seen, but this mailer clearly shows where she expects to try and find an opening, taking dead aim at Harris's stance on Gaza.

This being the only one I've seen from her, it's fair to say that Stein is running a shoestring campaign -- well, maybe more like a shoelace, perhaps -- so give her points for trying, I suppose. I have yet to see mailers from Chase, West, or any of the other third party upstarts.>



<Coda: Randall Terry, Eyebrow Raiser>
Now that the big day has arrived, I felt tempted to write some type of suitably apocalyptic, seemingly all-encompassing editorial, most likely as an addition to our "Tomorrow And Tomorrow And Tomorrow" creeps series, but ended up ditching the idea, for the usual boring reasons.

First of all, considering all the angst over the darkness of a potential Trump restoration, anything I'd say would seem repetitive, and not terribly useful. It's not like there's an 
upside to the potential imposition of a Trump police state, right? That is, unless you count numbered uniforms and the lack of needing any to-do lists -- because those will come straight from the Dear Leader, right?

Second, you can only outrun so much, handicap so much, and futureproof so much. Although it's natural for the commentariat to draw whatever parallels it can, between the latest race and the last one, every election ends up differing -- sometimes, in small ways, other times, with a more significant twist. At times, there's no rhyme or reason (for further reference, see "How Is It This Close?", below).

As a friend of mine pointed out recently, even if Trump and his shock troops attempt another all-out assault on the Capitol, "there's plenty of people doing time in prison because of it, (over the January 6, 2021 attempt), and the cops and the military will be ready for it." True enough, I agreed; I think it's more likely that Trump's legal team tries to send some sort of made-up case to the Extreme Court (excuse me, the Supreme Court).

After all, they've already carved a potential glide path for him to dictatorship, out of thin air; what's a little constitutional origami among friends, right? Especially when Trump appointed three of them. Or maybe, just maybe, the pollsters are wrong, and Harris's showing will prove strong enough, that the Extreme Supremes sit by their phones, waiting for the call that never comes. We'll see soon enough.

Lastly, though, is the notion thar real life apocalypses are way scarier than anything we could ever second guess, or conjure up. I got a reminder Sunday night, as I sat here, pecking away, when a voiceover cut in, after the 10 o'clock news. I'm paraphrasing from memory, but it sounded something like this:

"The following presentation contains extremely graphic images. Viewer discretion is advised. WXYZ is obliged to give air time, to whatever candidates request it, and takes no control over their content. The following views aired do not reflect those of management, or staff, at WXYZ."


For those reading between the lines, the inference isn't hard to miss: It's a political ad, okay? This wasn't our idea, either, so don't flood the station with calls, if you toss your cookies, or get really upset. Whatever happens, don't blame us. Before I could ponder the point any further, the political ad flickered to life, flashing image after image of dead, mangled babies, each one seemingly more twisted and misshapen than the last.

Constitution Party candidate Randall Terry was making his case for a presidential promotion with all the subtlety of a brick upside the head -- though I imagine he lobbed a few, during his '90s heyday as the leader of Operation Rescue, as it carried out its relentless intimidation campaign against abortion clinics, doctors, and women nationwide. 

Terry's face flickered into view amid all these disturbing images -- shaggier and hairier than I remembered, from his '90s heyday, yet brimming with all the determination that only the truly unhinged can muster, as he gravely intoned: "This is the last bastion of free speech. The only place that you can still have free speech is on a licensed station as a qualified federal candidate."

Then, he went right into his pitch: "A vote for Kamala is a vote for continuing the apocalypse against these babies." And so on, and so forth, wash, rinse, repeat. Nothing that we haven't already heard before, but will undoubtedly some disturb some, just the same (see the WTHR link below, to find out how you can weigh in on the ad).

Seeing Terry's ad reminded me, though, that for all the relentless gazing directed toward Trump, there's always a fresh nightmare lurking around the corner, ready to take his place. At some point, Trump will eventually, finally, mercifully, fade from the public square. For the two major parties, it's an outcome that will undoubtedly scramble the script - yet, as the likes of Terry make amply clear, there's always someone who may leave us wishing, "Hey, remember when Donald Trump was all we had to worry about? Boy, those sure were the good old days."

For me, the biggest takeaway of this particular election cycle comes down to one major realization. We've all heard the oft-quoted cliche, "We have met the enemy, and he is us." That same verdict, it's safe to say, goes double for our allies, though.

As I've told people, over and over and over again, throughout this campaign season, Batman, Superman, and James Bond aren't coming to our rescue, to make things right. Only we can save us, from us, even if that doesn't happen to be the advice we want to hear. Like it or not, a refusal to do the required heavy lifting isn't optional, if we really want a functioning democracy. And keep it in sound condition, too.

In the end, we are only as good as the vigilance we exercise -- and if we rise to the occasion, there's no telling what we can do. If we check it at the door? Then we have no one else to blame but ourselves, for whatever chaos that such a dereliction of duty unleashes. Let us hope, after today, that it does not become the epitaph that eternally defines us. --The Reckoner

Links To Go (Hurry. Hurry, 
Before All Those Fake Electors Scramble Your Brain):

The Atlantic: How Is It This Close?:
https://archive.ph/Dk6qT 
(Read the other relevant pieces on the page, too, for additional context)

The Guardian: Nostalgic Trump Wheels Out The Hits:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/05/donald-trump-us-election-2024-last-day-campaign

The Verge: Why You're Seeing Those Gross Political Ads:
https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/30/24283757/world-series-political-ads-anti-trans-abortion-dodgers-yankees

WTHR: WTHR Is Legally Required To Air Graphic Ad:
https://www.wthr.com/article/news/politics/elections/decision-2024/wthr-is-legally-required-to-air-graphic-ad-purchased-by-presidential-candidate-randall-terry-anti-abortion-advertisement/531-0ebf997d-eab6-4126-bc64-4b43f3aee910

Sunday, October 27, 2024

One Picture, 1,000 Words (Take III): Harris And Trump Trade Punches, Counterpunches


<Example of Harris-Walz campaign's Spanish language outreach, though this flyer is actually the title one of this four-page effort, as you'll see below...>


<Pages two and three spell out the nitty-gritty of this mailer, which is probably among the more elaborately-crafted ones that we've seen crossing our mailbox...>



<...And, last but not least, a Spanish language 
dunking on Project 2025, and Trump's links to it -- 
just in case anyone's missed the message>



<Apologies in advance for the quality, but the main point of interest here lies in the headline -- as in, the same veterans he called "losers" and "suckers," presumably (per his former Chief of Staff, John Kelly)?>



<Rear page of above Trump campaign mailer, targeting what his campaign perceives as a weak spot on veterans' issues...>




<Two different Trump mailers targeting Harris's ties to the Biden administration, attempting to cement her association with the cost of living issues that have soured perceptions toward the White House -- and, indeed, most likely played a role in hounding the President out of the 2024 race...>



<Another example of a Trump mailer, this one taking a more positive tack in emphasizing his belief that, whatever else people say about him, he had a hand in the positive aspects they remember. Cynics say that he's trying to take credit for the groundwork laid by his predecessor, Barack Obama. We'll know soon whose view will carry the day. --The Reckoner>

Sunday, October 20, 2024

One Picture, 1,000 Words (Take II): The Slotkin-Rogers Senate Slugfest

 






Continuing with our current theme, here are some flyers and mailers from the U.S. Senate slugfest between Democratic Congresswoman Elissa Slotkin, and her Republican counterpart, Mike Rogers. In many ways, this race typifies what we're seeing nationally. Both are among the more notable faces of Michigan's Congressional delegation, looking to move up into the bigger job that opened, when veteran Debbie Stabenow ruled out running for a fourth term.

Since 2019, Slotkin has represented a district, variously numbered as the Seventh and Eighth, that stretches from Lansing, to Detroit's outer north suburbs. In contrast, Rogers served the Eighth Congressional District from 2001 to 2015, notably as chairman of the U.S. Permanent Committee on Intelligence (2011-15). Since then, he's put his credentials as a former law enforcement officer to good use, as a national security commentator on CNN, and executive producer of the network's program, "Declassified: Untold Stories Of America's Spies."

Unlike his more flamboyant former colleagues, Rogers isn't a screaming bomb thrower, nor a partisan performance artist. His lower-key style simply doesn't inspire the same animosity or pure gut level disgust as Scott Perry's election denying antics do. Yet Rogers's attack approach seems wearily familiar -- blame Democrats, in general, and their nominee Kamala Harris, in particular, for everything major and minor.

Cost of living going up? All roads lead back to Wilmington. Is the road closure that bottlenecks your complex taking weeks longer to unravel? Team Harris is leaning on those orange barrel guys. Got dinged by 50 cents, for an overdue library book? One call to the front desk sealed your fate. You get the idea.

The only problem, of course, with all this finger-pointing is that it doesn't offer any new insight, unless it's to suggest that Trump didn't get enough to work the magic tricks that eluded the adults in the room. And that's the basic problem with people like Rogers, who seems reasonably intelligent, but nevertheless, voted with Trump 95 to 100% on the time (FiveThirtyEight). 

It's a factoid that raises a reasonable concern, should we end up stuck with a Trump restoration. Slotkin has taken her share of knocks from progressives, which hasn't hurt her at the electoral box office. So far, polls show her clinging to a narrow lead (3-3.5%), a marked contrast from the picture painted in this recent Politi.com story:
https://www.deadlinedetroit.com/articles/32405/politico_internal_republican_poll_shows_slotkin_with_sizable_lead_over_rogers_in_michigan_senate_race

If the story is accurate, and Slotkin really has opened up a wider lead against Rogers, it might explain the flood of literature we're seeing from him lately. Carpetbombing your mailbox doesn't seem like the sign of a candidate who's on a winning track, but maybe Rogers is trying to make up for lost ground and time, having lagged consistently in fundraising throughout the race. (Current figures show war chests of $80 and $62 million for Slotkin and Rogers, respectively.)

At any rate, here are some relevant images from the flyers and mailers we have seen, with relevant comments, as needed. With just over a couple weeks left till Election Day, the frenzied carpetbombing of all those mass mailings is likely to only heat up -- as ever, we'll present the most notable ones that catch our eye. And yours, too, perhaps. --The Reckoner

===========================================================================================================================


<An atypically sunny, positive ad from the Rogers camp, serving as a reminder of what candidates --- particularly incumbents -- used to do, before the "ready, aim, splat!" approach took hold as the go-to campaigning mode nationwide...>

==========================================================================================================================


<I don't see my overdue library book nor clogged local road among the list of failings enumerated here, but give Mr. Rogers time -- I'm sure that he'll lob one, soon enough, to a mailbox near you...>

==========================================================================================================================


<Back to Mike Rogers Playbook 101: Vote for those, like him, who marched in lockstep with the "Swamp Drainer." That should fix everything that ails us, right? 

The verbiage here ('big spending Democrats...like Slotkin") makes us wonder if there's some fill-in-the-blank computer program, deep in the dark heart of the Republican National Committee, that helps candidates whip out these sorts of mailers -- like some twisted political game of Mad Libs, isn't it?>

==========================================================================================================================


So far, the only Slotkin mailer that's crossed our threshold (maybe our fellow tenants have pitched theirs), aimed from the other side of the equation, with a knock against Republican hegemony firmly in the crosshairs ("We deserve to buy a home, build wealth, and start a family, just like every generation has been able to do before now").


Wednesday, July 31, 2024

The Best Reason To Celebrate Kamala Harris's Ascent (Summed Up In One Image)

 

<https://www.downwithtyranny.com/>


What a difference a couple weeks makes, eh? Especially this observation that I offered, in our annual Fourth of July message ("A Republic, If You Can Keep it...But For How Long?"): "And if elections really are about the next generation, it's high time for Democrats to begin ushering in new leadership."

Well, son of a gun, they actually did. Just not any of the usual suspects (AOC, Cori Bush, Ro Khanna, Ayanna Presley, and Jamie Raskin) that I named in our message, but Vice President Kamala Harris. Which is fine; that's why beauty pageants always choose first and second runner-ups, right? Just in case the queen (or king, for that matter) can't fulfill their duties. Or something like that.

But seriously, all jokes apart, Harris's imminent nomination well turn out among the best "just in case" scenarios we've seen recently. All that dreary speculation about President Biden's age and mental condition? Off the table! All the endless maundering about the cracks in the Democratic coalition? Off the table! All those poll standings that looked like a rearrangement, lately, of the deck chairs on the Titanic? Off the table!

With less than 100 days to go before the November election, Harris's debut on the national stage could hardly have gone better: crowd counts (10,000 at last night's Atlanta, GA rally) and fundraising totals ($200 million) that leave her boss's numbers in the dust. Enthusiasm that's soaring off the charts (44,000 joining a recent Zoom call aimed at Black women). Feverish speculation about who gets the phone call to become her running mate (if you can't improve on Trump's selection of the Billion Dollar Hillbilly, JD Vance, you shouldn't be doing politics, period).

But, as the featured graphic demonstrates, the best reason to celebrate Harris's arrival is seeing all that anti-Biden merchandise now rendered worthless, at a stroke. Never again will we have to hear that wretched catch phrase ("Let's Go, Brandon"), unless it turns up in some PBS documentary.

Ditto for the baseball cap that the Trump-loving village president so proudly sports at the meetings I cover ("Cleanup On Aisle 46"). Unless, of course, he wants to take a Sharpie to it, and try to update its equally miserable slogan.  Then again, he might want to keep it in his attic, and wait and see if it appreciates enough to sell on eBay.

Whatever. Honestly, it's purely selfish on my part, but for once, it's Trump and his  fan club cult who are now caught scrambling like fire ants after a lump of sugar at the picnic. For once!  Now that it's looking like a real race again, they literally don't know what to do. For once! 

I imagine that same village official balling up his fists, and pounding his couch, after seeing the lightning bolt strike ("Biden Quits"): "NO! NO! NO  F#ckin' way! Goddamn it, they can't do this to us! No effin' way can he do this!" But do it, he has done, and now, "there's no going back," to quote Harris's mantra of the hour.

Because, honestly, between all their endless, stale performance art bits about "childless cat ladies," and the "Christian nation" we were never destined to become; their relentless attempts to impose that blinkered (read: 99% white) Christian nativist outlook, on those of us who don't buy into it; or their oily, authoritarian Lucy 'n' Ethel schemes to twist American democracy beyond recognition...

...they're just f#cking horrible, awful people, who deserve the almightiest shellacking at the polls. Unstoppable force, meet immovable object, or something along those lines. Or, as Trump's campaign manager confessed recently: "Project 2025 is a pain in the ass." Time will tell, but as a certain fast food clown used to say: "I'm lovin' it." And guess what? For now, that's good enough. --The Reckoner