Friday, October 31, 2025

A Treat For Joe Meek Fans: Return To 304 Holloway Road (1992)

<"No, mate, we didn't get free sandwiches in those days..." 
Drummer Clem Cattini (left),who played on "Telstar," 
shares a light moment with Meek biographer John Repsch.
 
The woman behind them seems unsure 
what she's doing in this company...
("Just who are these nutters, exactly?")

"Return To Holloway Road" (YouTube capture)>

<i.>
What hasn't already been said about Joe Meek (1929-67), and the legend of his home studio at 304 Holloway Road? For casual fans, he's simply "The Telstar Man," who created, produced and recorded the Tornadoes' monster #1 US/UK chart-topper of 1962, which inspired the Con O'Neil-fronted biopic (Telstar, 2008).

Yet even in abbreviated form, his resume is impressive, going strictly on the string of big hits that he helmed there, from "Johnny Remember Me," by John Leyton (#1 UK, 1961), and its equally inspired follow-up, "Wild Wind" (#2 UK), to  "Just Like Eddie" (Heinz, #5 UK, 1963), "Globetrotter" (The Tornados, #5 UK, 1963), and his last major blockbuster, "Have I The Right" (The Honeycombs, #1 Australia, Canada, UK, Sweden; #5 US; #2 Holland, 1964).

Mind you, those are only the greatest hits. We're not even counting the quirkier fare that didn't chart, like David John & The Mood's three classic singles, or The Syndicats' "Crawdaddy Simone," which made no impression on its 1965 release, but has since gained its rightful recognition as a greasy, gritty slab of tough-minded R&B-driven rock (a status confirmed by its position as the closing number over the credits in Telstar). 

In fact, it's no exaggeration to view Joe Meek as a one-man game changer, starting with his status as Britain's first major independent producer. Try and imagine the British Invasion happening, for instance, without the transatlantic success of "Telstar" to kick-start it (coming a full year before the Beatles took the nation by storm). Reams of print have been devoted to Meek's production techniques, from his liberal use of compression, echo, and phasing, incorporation of found sounds, and old school workarounds (like speeding up recordings, to make up for his vocally-challenged artists' shortcomings).

And, while his methods are justly celebrated, let's not forget how far ahead of his time he reached as a songwriter, too. One of the more notable examples is "Do You Come Here Often?", an organ-driven, largely instrumental wink-wink, nudge-nudge nod to Meek's own repressed homosexuality -- still an official no-no, when he allegedly shot his landlady, and then committed suicide, on February 3, 1967 -- and is generally considered the first overtly gay pop record.

I could go on and on, but don't want to lose us in the weeds, so why not check out the first time we celebrated the essence of Joe's genius, and one of his major proteges, Screaming Lord Sutch, right at this link -- you'll get the idea quickly enough:


<Left to right: Honey Lantree (The Honeycombs), John Repsch, Roger LaVern and Clem Cattini (The Tornados)revisit 
the finer points of recording in the Beat Boom era,
in this scene from "Return To 304...">

<ii.>
Needless to say, I didn't know any of these things when I bought John Repsch's groundbreaking biography, The Legendary Joe Meek: The Telstar Man, in 1989. If I recall correctly, I did so on the strength of reviews in Time Out, or some music-/hipster-oriented rag along those lines. I'm fairly sure that the cartoonishly sensational cover -- a closeup shot of Joe, surrounded by the Grim Reaper and a bevy of 45s, circling him like so many UFOs -- helped to seal the deal. It certainly stood out a mile on the book rack at Tower Records' Piccadilly Circus outlet.

So imagine my surprise at finding this half hour film, "Return To 304 Holloway Road," on YouTube! It's an amazing document, essentially a celebration of the space that served as Joe's creative home, featuring many of the principals who recorded there -- as you'll see in these screenshots accompanying this post. The heavier hitters present include Tornados drummer Clem Cattini, and keyboardist Roger LaVern; Honeycombs drummer-vocalist Honey Lantree, and rhythm guitarist Martin Murray; and His Lordship himself, David (Screaming Lord) Sutch.

You also see members of lesser-rung bands like The Moontrekkers, and the Puppets, plus others whose recognition came long, long after the fact. Notable examples of the latter phenomenon include Danny Rivers, since documented on Cherry Red's Tea Chest Tapes reissue series, and the late Kim Roberts, who recorded a dozen unreleased tracks -- of which two graced Joe Meek's Girls (1997), a CD dedicated to some of the notable female artists he recorded.

Yet "Return To 304 Holloway Road" is a film without a backstory, it seems, judging from my online attempts to pin one down. It doesn't feature on the Internet Movie Database (IMDB), where the strangest, most obscure movies march happily on -- such as the one I saw last night, Encounter With The Unknown (1972), a B-grade horror anthology narrated by Rod Serling. Nor did I find any online references to it, however fleeting, a real oddity in a virtual era where exhaustive documentation is now the norm.

The one area of inquiry seemed most fruitful -- searching the respective company and director/producer, SPA Films Limited and Bob Frost, credited with the film -- also comes up short, beyond a listing on Companies House, the corporate UK tracking site. I did find a blog obituary, penned by a colleague on Frost's passing in 2016, that makes no mention of "Return To 304." (In any event, we know the date, which rolls out onscreen, right at the beginning, for reasons that will become apparent shortly.)

Searches for further information on SPA Films Ltd. yielded little, beyond basic details posted on Companies House, the UK's corporate tracking website. I found that SPA Films Ltd. got up and running on 10/2/90. Prior to that time, a different company, River Bounty Ltd. -- credited with post-production -- had been operating since December 1990. SPA Films itself dissolved in October 2020, four years after its founder's passing, which seems like a decent run, all things considered.


<"Not just now!" Honey Lantree 
and Martin Murray remember 
that moment on the stairs...>

<iii.>
Whatever you want to say about "Return To 304," it's definitely not a slick affair. How else to explain the filmmakers' curious decision not to start on the interviews or storytelling until we roughly reach the 12- or 13-minute mark? Until then, we're treated to the sounds of the guests milling around, in various configurations, gabbling like ducks at a pond (which isn't a criticism, or a putdown, just a realistic take on what we're seeing there).

I'm guessing that the filmmakers included these moments in the spirit of cinema verite, but for viewers, it's a deadly choice. Far better to skip over to that near-halfway point, and see what kinds of stories emerge, once Repsch finally gets down to business with his guests. But once he does, the results are fairly insightful, and rewarding to hear, from the parties involved.

Clem Cattini -- remarkably, still with us, at 88 -- comments about the casual nature of Joe's setup, which certainly came across as an radical one for musicians used to the acoustically soundproofed walls and tiled ceilings that prevailed in more formal studio settings. Workarounds were the norm, since the outside world itself interfered more often than not, Cattini recalls: "We had to stop recording, to let lorries go past."

As Cattini notes, landlady Violet Shenton insisted on having the music stop by 10:00 p.m., and she was never shy about telling Joe if she felt that the proceedings were getting too loud for comfort. His disclosure prompts Repsch to ask, "He didn't ever say, 'Look, Clem, can you drum quietly?'" Cattini smiles, zinger at the ready: "They knew that would be impossible."

Such comments only hint of Joe's reputation as a moody, unpredictable taskmaster, though some express this view more bluntly than others -- such as Roger LaVern, credited with additional keyboards on "Telstar".  "I remember so many problems with Joe," he chuckles, with a wicked smile.

It's an observation that draws a hearty round of laughter from the gathering, which becomes a pivotal midpoint for the film, as Murray recounts -- when Joe drafted him and his fellow Honeycombs to lay down the insistent foot stomping beat that plays such a prominent role in their signature hit, "Have I The Right."

Getting that task done meant lining them everyone up on the stairs, and having them pound mightily together, over and over, until Joe finally felt satisfied -- a process that wound on throughout the night, and into the wee hours, when the cleaning woman arrived, at 6:00 a.m.

Now came the hard part, as Murray elaborates: "She was very anxious to sweep the stairs." He pauses, and delivers the punchline. "I think she thought the stairs were falling in, because she was underneath them: 'Joe! I'd like to do the stairs!' And he got really angry, and said, 'Not just now!' Anyway, she didn't say too much. She might have sworn under her breath..."

"Was he pleased with the end product?" Repsch inquires.

"Oh, thrilled," Murray responds. "Absolutely thrilled."

"Yeah, he would be," Honey nods, looking -- well, absolutely fabulous, positively smashing, or insert whatever phrase works for you here -- in her royal blue pant suit and blazer. 

But then, again, five million worldwide sales of a hit single will do that, right? "Have I The Right" had legs, as they say in "da biz," to the point of inspiring a German-language cover ("Hab Ich Das Recht") for the Deutsch teenbeat market. The Honeycombs soon found themselves packed off on an early template for those never-ending world tours that accompany some unexpected success or other (which is how they became the first pop group to play Thailand, for instance, as Repsch's bio details).

It's not hard to imagine Joe bopping his head whenever "Have I The Right" boomed out from his radio, or the jukebox at the pub, losing himself in daydream after daydream: Yeah, see, that's how it's done, you bastards! I showed you with "Telstar," I'm showing you again with "Have I The Right," and I'll keep on showing you...once I get the next "Telstar" down, that is!

But that unexpected tonic of major success marked the last time that Joe would ever experience such a phenomenon, for a sustained period. Three years later, his own bright, shining star of success that he never stopped pursuing so avidly, would come crashing down to Earth, in a welter of tragedy, one that left numerous unanswered questions. But that's another story, for another time.



<Above: Lord Sutch palms off one of his infamous "Loony Money" notes on Clem Cattini, who's fully in on the joke.

<Below: Honey Lantree and Martin Murray look on with amusement, as Lord Sutch prepares to lead the visitors on a singalong for his birthday.>



<iv.>
The film takes yet another left turn around the 20-minute mark, as Screaming Lord Sutch -- or David Sutch, perhaps, to his inner circle -- chugs boisterously up the stairs, eager to do his part in promoting the Meek legacy as someone who recorded several notable singles with him between 1961 and 1965.

The best-known is "Jack The Ripper" (1963), which naturally prompts Sutch to lead a bawdy singalong of lyrics that likely wouldn't pass muster in today's climate: "
"Well, he walks down the street/Every girl he meets, he asks, "Is your name Mary Kelly?'"

Sutch and Meek both shared a well-documented love of horror and sci-fi, which makes itself felt in some of their other singles, like "Till The Following Night" (1961), "Monster In Black Tights" (1963), and "Dracula's Daughter."

I remember playing some of these songs for a support group, whom I'd persuaded to do a presentation about these two particular gents. 
I went in, thinking, "Ah, these records will sound pretty tame to their ears, won't they? I bet they don't even tap their feet!"

To my great surprise, and enduring amusement, I saw a few people shrink back in their chairs! 
One person, if I recall correctly, practically jumped out of their seat after I pulled out the Moontrekkers' moody 1961 instrumental, "Night Of The Vampire" -- which opens with a full minute of howls, shrieks, and moans, amid a sonic backdrop of gusty winds, before the song actually kicks in. (Joe apparently is among those shrieking their lungs out; go figure, eh?)

Not surprisingly, perhaps, the BBC promptly banned the single as "unsuitable for persons of a nervous disposition," though not before it had climbed to #50 on the UK charts. When I asked for comments about the music, it didn't take long for a consensus to form: "Definitely someone who's obsessed with the dark side!" (At this point, perhaps, you may feel fully entitled to ask, "Well, what did you expect?")

His grand entrance made, all eyes rapidly shift to Sutch in full-on promo mode, as he shamelessly plugs his latest effort, The Screaming Lord Sutch Story (EMI), which prompts him to drop a sardonic observation: "I don't give 'em away, any records out, 'cause I'm still trying to get some royalties!"

It's an understandable comment from a man whose status owed much to his knack for endless, yet inventive self-promotion, and his over the top live act -- necessities for an artist who never achieved major success, even as he hired numerous musicians who later became famous in their own right. (Legendary guitarists Jimmy Page and Ritchie Blackmore are just two examples of this phenomenon.)

It's the reason, perhaps, when Murray innocently asks Sutch what he's been up to lately, His Lordship replies a tad defensively: "Some us still do gigs!"  
That unerring combination of self-promotion and self-deprecation also lent itself well to Sutch's satirical political forays -- including 39 campaigns for Parliament, between 1963 and 1997 -- most commonly as the face of the Official Monster Raving Loony Party (which he co-founded, and still exists). 

As part of the satire, Sutch produced his own brand of "Loony Notes" (signed by the "Chief Shyster"). Naturally, he doesn't miss the opportunity to palm one off on Cattini, his vastly more successful peer (who holds a world of playing on at least 44 #1 hits, the most of any session musician). 

"This is worth more than Joe's royalties!" Cattini cracks, which prompts an equally gentle jab from Sutch: "Don't spend it all at once."

Amid all the good-natured tomfoolery, Sutch announces that it's his birthday, which provides the cue for Murray to lead an appropriately rowdy singalong of the old standard. A cake is duly wheeled out, with a black coffin as the centerpiece -- which prompts a slight face from Murray: "Just a nice thing to put on the table, isn't it? A coffin..."

Though served up to burnish Sutch's horror rock image, that coffin offers a poignant and unsettling sight, in light of his own suicide, seven years later. As Sutch's biographer has observed: who cheers up the man who sees his job as cheering everybody else up?

Of course, Lord Sutch wasn't the only musician in Meek's orbit to die prematurely. Kim Roberts, seen briefly here and there, also passed away, of heart problems, at age 55. Cattini's example aside, many of the participants here are long gone, though Sutch's birthday announcement provides an important clue -- in terms of sussing out one major reason for filming "Return To 304."

A quick search discerns the date of Sutch's birthday as November 10, when His Lordship turned 51; reason enough, it seems, for rounding up the principals featured here, and celebrate him, at the same time as Joe Meek. 
I also suspect that John Repsch played a major part in this project, since he's the one we see working the room, chatting up this person here, firing off a question or two at somebody else over there. In other words, he not only lent his face to this film, but probably had a hand in its creation behind the scenes, as well.

After all, it's touted as a VHS issue on YouTube, which suggests either a local or regional release, even if it didn't hit UK cinemas nationwide. Put another way, I doubt the producers would have devoted nearly half the contents to the social aspect of the night, if they didn't think that someone might sit through it all. In any event, further details behind "Return To 304"'s creation and release would be most welcome.


<A couple of young fans treat the filmmakers
to a chorus or two of "Have I The Right,"
in the bathroom, which also doubled
as Joe's echo chamber...>


>Coda<
Fittingly, "Return To 304" closes with an excerpt from "Telstar," the song that launched Joe Meek -- and indeed, so many of the musicians that he drew into his orbit -- for that brief, yet exhilarating rocket ride to the proverbial "toppermost of the poppermost," to coin a phrase from his Merseybeat rivals, the Beatles. 

Because, in the end, "Return To 304 Holloway Road" reminds us that Joe Meek was much a metaphor, as a flesh and blood person -- as someone dedicated to breaking the sound barrier, figuratively and literally, in every sense of the term. Watching Telstar, amid its one glaring factual error -- Joe Meek and Heinz did not sleep with one another -- makes me think, "If only someone had gotten to this guy faster, made feel better in his own skin, reassure him that others really did love him, and that his future would turn out, in the end, how much more music would we have gotten?"

Because, in a sense, that is what happened. Shortly after Joe's suicide, a higher court freed up a mountain of "Telstar" royalties that had been frozen by a plagiarism suit, which also got dismissed. Cherry Red Records is busily reissuing the cream of the so-called "Tea Chest Tapes," some 600 trunks of reel to reel spools from Joe's many, many sessions, ensuring that new discoveries about his methods will continue for years to come.

Bands continue to cover "Telstar," and other notable Meek-related songs, while others reference some aspects of his production that strike their fancy. How appropriate, for instance, that Muse frontman Matt Bellamy happens to be the son of George Bellamy, who played rhythm guitar on "Telstar" -- proof positive, for those needing it, that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

The homosexuality that Meek spent so much time repressing became legal for Britons in July 1967, only five months after his death -- news that might finally have healed the various fissures tearing and grinding at his psyche, which caused him to self-medicate it via a vicious cycle of uppers and downers.

As Repsch notes, people buy the most trivial of records associated with Joe Meek, simply because he produced them. In 60 years, he's gone from someone who died broke and embittered, whose name has never been pervasive than today. What a shame he didn't live to see any of it, and yet, what a remarkable outcome it is, to see so many people still finding something worth celebrating as a synonym for sonic exploration.

And that's the chief appeal of this quirky little piece of film, however obscure it may be. And oh, yes, while we're about it? Happy Halloween. --The Reckoner

Links To Go (Hurry, Hurry, Take
The Last Train To Meeksville):
Islington Tribune: The Life And Violent Death

Journal On The Art Of Record Production:

Queer Heritage: "Do You Come Here Often?":
https://www.queermusicheritage.com/mar2015meek.html


 Return To Holloway Road:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuhiD1VDPQU


<Above: From the film: 304, as it appeared 
to the outside world, in 1990s-era London

Below: 304, as it is today:
If only these walls could talk...
A plaque now marks the site.>


Saturday, October 18, 2025

Mad King Watch (Take X): Once More, With Feeling: No Thrones, No Crowns, No Kings (UPDATED. 10/20/25)

 


<About This Event>

In America, we don’t put up with would-be kings.

Our peaceful movement is only getting bigger and stronger. “NO KINGS” is more than just a slogan—it’s the foundation our nation was built upon. Born in the streets, carried by millions in chants and on posters, it echoes from city blocks to rural town squares, uniting people across this country to fight dictatorship together.

The president thinks his rule is absolute. But in America, we don’t have kings, and we won’t back down against chaos, corruption, and cruelty. Grow our movement and join us.

A core principle behind all No Kings events is a commitment to nonviolent action. We expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with our values and to act lawfully at these events. Weapons of any kind, including those legally permitted, should not be brought to events.




<Top 10 Signs Spotted Today...>

"Billionaires Are
Treading On All Of Us"

"Free Balls,
For Members Of Congress
Who Have Lost Theirs"

"I Speak For The Trees,
I Stand With The Frog"

"Mark Of The Beast"
(w/image of red MAGA hat)

"No Crowns For The Clown"

"No-Faux-King-Way"

"The Only Monarch We Need"
(alongside an image of the butterfly of the same name)

"People Have The Power...
To Wrestle The Earth 
From Fools"
(always nice to see that 
Patti Smith song referenced)

"Things Are So Bad,
Even The Introverts Are Here"

"Trump = Tariffs, Inflation, Chaos"

====================================================================================================================================================

<Text Of Bernie Sanders Speech:
Washington, DC Rally>

Thank you, Washington. What a great turnout.

Thank you, Indivisible, for your fantastic organizing.

Thank you to the millions of Americans, from our smallest towns to our largest cities, in every state in our country, who are gathering today at thousands of rallies.

Mike Johnson, the Republican Speaker of the House, called these rallies “hate America“ events. Boy. Does he have that wrong. Millions of Americans are coming out today not because they “hate America.” We’re here because we love America.

We’re here because we’re going to do everything we can to honor the sacrifices of millions of men and women who, over the last 250 years, fought and sometimes died to defend our democracy and our freedoms.

In 1776, with extraordinary courage, the founders of our country announced to the world that they would no longer be ruled by the king of England, who had absolute power over their lives. They demanded freedom. And to bring that about they fought a bloody war against the British Empire and the most powerful military in the world. Tens of thousands of Americans died in that 8-year war - but our forefathers fought on and they won.

And in 1789, after winning that war, they did something extraordinary. They established the first democratic form of government in modern history. They said loudly and boldly to the entire world: No more kings. In America, we the people will rule.

And today, in 2025, in this dangerous moment in American history, our message is exactly the same. No, President Trump, we don’t want you or any other king to rule us. Thank you very much, but we will maintain our democratic form of society. We will not move toward authoritarianism. In America, We the People will rule.

When he was sworn in as the nation’s first president, George Washington called this attempt at self-government an “experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.”

My fellow Americans: In an unprecedented way, that experiment is now in danger.

It is in danger when we have a president who wants more and more power in his own hands - and the hands of his fellow Oligarchs.

It is in danger when we have a president who claims that peaceful protest in Portland, OR or Chicago, IL is an “insurrection” and calls in the U.S. military. And then threatens to arrest the mayors and governors who resist him.

It is in danger when we have masked agents working for ICE breaking down doors, throwing people into vans without due process and taking them to God knows where.

It is in danger when we have a president who sues and intimidates the media, who wants no criticism of himself or his policies and who undermines the First Amendment of our Constitution - the very foundation of our democracy.

Our country is in danger when we have a president who threatens to arrest or imprison political opponents who stand against him - including the Attorney General of New York State, a sitting US Senator and the Governor of California.

It is in danger when we have a president who undermines freedom of thought and dissent at our colleges and universities, and who attacks law firms that oppose him in court.

It is in danger when we have a president who threatens to impeach judges who rule against him.

It is in danger when we have a president who ignores Congress, refuses to spend money that Congress appropriates and takes away money from states that voted against him.

It is in danger when we have a president who demands that states redraw congressional maps to ensure that his chosen candidates win future elections.

It is in danger when we have a President who illegally fires tens of thousands of federal employees right here in Washington, DC and throughout the country, and rips up union contracts that workers have fought for and won.

It is in danger when we have a President who grossly violates the Constitution by accepting gifts from foreign leaders – including a $400 million plane from the royal family of Qatar – and then allows that family to build an air force facility in Idaho.

But let’s be clear: This is not just about one man’s greed, one man’s corruption or one man’s contempt for our Constitution. This is about a handful of the wealthiest people on earth who, in their insatiable greed, have hijacked our economy and our political system in order to enrich themselves at the expense of everyone else.

Yes. I’m talking about Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and the other multi-billionaires who were sitting right behind Donald Trump when he was inaugurated – the very same billionaires who funded his campaign, who have bestowed gifts upon him and who have seen huge increases in their wealth and power since Trump took office.

Yes, I’m talking about the insanity of one person, Mr. Musk, now owning more wealth than the bottom 52% of American households.

I’m talking about the incredible injustice of the top 1% in this country now owning more wealth than the bottom 93%.

I'm talking about the richest people in America becoming much, much richer, while 60% of our people live paycheck to paycheck, struggling every day to pay their rent and mortgages, pay for childcare and education, pay for their health care and prescription drugs, afford decent quality food for their kids and put aside a few bucks for their retirements.

I am talking about our nation, the richest country in the history of the world, having the highest rate of childhood and senior poverty of almost any major country on earth.

I am talking about our great nation having 85 million Americans uninsured or underinsured and 800,000 people who are homeless, while Mr. Musk is on his way to becoming a trillionaire.

I am talking about the incredible danger of the richest people in this country pouring many hundreds of billions of dollars into artificial intelligence and robotics which, in the next decade, will decimate tens of millions of jobs for the American working class.

I am talking about a billionaire class who believe they have a divine right to rule, and who not only want massive tax breaks for themselves, but who reject any form of accountability or checks on their power.

My fellow Americans: We rejected the divine right of kings in the 1700’s. We will not accept the divine right of oligarchs today.

And now let’s take a look at where we are today on the 18th day of a government shutdown, which is depriving millions of federal employees of the paychecks they desperately need and deserve.

Let me cut to the chase and tell you exactly what this shutdown is all about. As a result of Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” which made massive cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, 15 million low-income and working class Americans are going to lose the health care they desperately need.

My friends, studies suggest that when you throw these 15 million people of the health care they have, 50,000 of them will die unnecessarily every single year. 50,000 people.

But that’s not all. As a result of that same legislation, over 20 million Americans are going to see, on average, a doubling of their health insurance premiums through the Affordable Care Act.

In my state of Vermont, just the other day, people received notices from the insurance companies that their health care premiums would triple, or even quadruple. Got that? And this is going on all over the country. At a time when we are already paying, by far, the highest prices in the world for health care, Americans are going to see a doubling or tripling of their health care premiums.

And why? Why are the Republicans making a broken health care system, a dysfunctional health care system, even worse? Why are they bringing our health care system to the verge of collapse? And we all know the answer. It was to give a trillion dollars in tax breaks to Mr. Musk, Mr. Bezos, Mr. Zuckerberg, Mr. Ellison and the rest of the 1%.

One trillion dollars in cuts to Medicaid and the ACA. A trillion in tax breaks for the 1%.

That, my friends, is what this shutdown is about.

And let me be very clear: No. I will not vote for a budget that throws 15 million Americans off health care and causes 50,000 unnecessary deaths per year.

No. I will not vote for a budget that doubles premiums, on average, for 20 million Americans and forces Americans to pay 40 or 50% of their limited incomes for health care.

No. I will not vote for a budget that forces nursing homes, rural hospitals and community health centers to lay off staff and close their doors throughout this country – all to give huge tax breaks to people who don’t need them.

I say to my Republican colleagues: Come back from your monthlong vacation, start negotiating and do not allow the American health care system to be destroyed. End this shutdown.

And let’s be clear: Ending the shutdown is not just about saving our health care system, as important as that is. It is about saying clearly, once and for all, that we will not live under the rule of one man.

My fellow Americans: We are the greatest country in the history of the world. And when we stand together and don’t let demagogues divide us up, there is nothing that we cannot accomplish.

Yes, we can create a vibrant democracy by ending Citizens United and not allowing billionaires to buy elections.

Yes, we can join the rest of the industrialized world and guarantee health care to all people as a human right.

Yes, we can take on the greed of the pharmaceutical industry and no longer pay by far the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs.

Yes, we can build millions of units of low-income and affordable housing and allow our younger generation to enjoy the American Dream with a home of their own.

Yes, we can make public colleges and universities tuition-free and have the best childcare and public school system in the entire world.

Yes, we can expand Social Security so that every senior in this country can retire with dignity.

Yes, we can raise the minimum wage to a living wage and guarantee every worker the right to join a union.

Yes, we can lead the world in transforming our energy system away from fossil fuels and create millions of good-paying jobs as we save the planet.

Yes, we can guarantee that every woman in this country has the right to control her own body.

Yes, we can have a foreign policy that guarantees that never again will American taxpayer dollars be used to starve children in Gaza or any place else.

And now, let me raise the question that I’ve been asked over and over again: Bernie, great ideas, but how are you going to pay for it?

So, now let me be very clear: At a time when the wealthiest people in America have never ever had it so good, at a time when billionaires are paying an effective tax rate lower than a truck driver or nurse, yes, the top 1% and large profitable corporations will pay their fair share in taxes.

My fellow Americans: The Establishment, including the corporate media and many of my colleagues in Congress, want you to believe that you are powerless. They want you to believe that you cannot change the status quo. But that’s a lie.

Throughout the history of our country, when Americans have stood up and fought for justice, they have prevailed.

When the Founders stood up to King George, they were told it was impossible. But they won.

When abolitionists fought to end slavery, they were told it was impossible. But they won.

When workers organized to form unions and stood up to their bosses, they were told it was impossible. But they won.

When women demanded the right to vote, they were told it was impossible. But they won.

When Black Americans fought to end segregation, they were told it was impossible. But they won.

When the LGBT community stood up for their rights, they were told it was impossible. But they won.

They did it then. We can and will do it now.

How do I know we will succeed? Look around at this huge crowd here in Washington.

But it’s not just here. As I understand it, today, October 18, 2025, there are more people out on the streets in more communities all across our country than ever before in American history.

This is not the end. This is just the beginning.

Together, we will create the kind of nation that you and I know we can become. A nation devoted to freedom, justice and democracy.

Thank you all very much.


“No man is good enough 

to govern another man, 

without that other's consent.”

<Abraham Lincoln>

====================================================================================================================================

Mobilize/Organize

New Year's Resolution: 
Undo Project 2025

Take Back 
Our Government: 2026 Midterms

======================================================================

Find A Protest Near You:

Sunday, October 5, 2025

Amazon's Charmless Charm Offensive (Coming Back For More)


<Amazon Mailer:
Rear 
Photo: The Reckoner>

<Suggested Soundtrack: 
"Here We Go Again" (The Sex Pistols)>

<i.>
They're at it again, or so it seems. Imagine my surprise at getting this latest mailer from Amazon, though I shouldn't be: Christmas is coming, which means they need seasonal workers to handle this, that, and the other. What's interesting here is the wording, starting with the large print buzzwords on the front cover (see below): "Opportunity." "Stability." (Shades of those infamous "Opportunity Economy" adverts that characterized Kamala Harris's losing Presidential campaign.)

From there, it's off to the key planks of what I'd call Amazon's campaign platform, starting with its flagship promise ("health insurance on day one"), free skills training for higher pay, and an average wage of over $23 an hour. (You also get a helpful link to get the company's side of the story.) For extra emphasis, it's repeated on the rear, complete with suitably diverse images of Amazon's worker bees, happily toiling away -- three in all, of Black and brown folk, which seems slightly inconsistent with Amazon's resident Dr. Evil, Jeff Bezos, so happily bending his knee to one Donald Trump.

Which makes him do all sorts of uncool, like, y'know, firing Karen Attiah, the Washington Post's last remaining Black columnist (see below). Or, to put it even more succinctly, someone who enjoys such outsized power and wealth shouldn't be joining history's most lawless President in his current scorched earth war against DEI (or anything vaguely progressive, for that matter).

And that's, before we get into all of Amazon's other sins, from its hostility to unionism, its infamous warehouses and their Dickensian conditions, and their relentless squashing of anyone who tries to compete with them. None of which stops them from arguing, "But hey, man, we're just like you, right? Right?" Wrong. 


<Amazon Mailer:
Front Cover 
Photo: The Reckoner>


<ii.>
But, again...let's take Amazon's pitch at face value, for the sake of argument. Who wouldn't enjoy making $23 an hour, or the notion of "health insurance on day one?" Sounds appealing on its face, doesn't it? Sure. That is, if you stay there enough to enjoy them. With epidemic levels of "churn" -- the blander way of saying, "never-ending employee turnover" -- approaching 150 percent, something clearly has to give.

Not every task lends itself to automation, and robots can only do so much, even as Amazon keeps looking for new ways of squeezing every last ounce of sweat from its beleaguered workforce (see link below). Judging by the nuggets I stumbled on from this Columbus, OH-based Reddit thread, I'm not only the one who wonders, "Why did I get this in the mail":

#1) "My first thought was 'didn’t someone on Reddit observe that their churn rate was so high that eventually every unemployed person in Columbus would be a former employee?' Has it happened already?

Then I flipped it over, and it was addressed to me and my husband. What the hell? We are both employed at jobs we’ve had for decades."

#2) "They were even frugal enough to sort the list and put both our names on one postcard rather than sending us two."

#3) "This is the answer; seasonal hiring starts now. I was once a seasonal employee for them so yeah. Oddly, I haven't received this mailing, guess they're tired of me!"

#4) "We did! My son works there, but the postcard was addressed to me, my husband and my daughter who moved out of state 9 years ago - so weird!!"



<The only man to last the course: Unione Siciliana President Mike Merlo gets a magnificent wax and flower effigy for his funeral, held on November, 1923, in Chicago.

Pallbearers included Mayor William E Dever, Police Chief Morgan A. Collins, State's Attorney Robert E. Crowe, and future Mayor Anton Cermak. Says something about the culture of the time, doesn't it?>

https://www.weirduniverse.net/blog/comments/the_funeral_of_mike_merlo


<iii.>
Of course, extreme situations -- by themselves -- don't always drive people away. One of my favorite examples comes from the 1920s -- another era of rampant inequality, bolstered by a corporate culture of fear and punishment  -- in the Unione Siciliana (or Unione Siciliane, or Unione Sicilione, depending on the account you read).

The Unione began in 1895 as an Italian-American fraternal organization offering burial and health insurance benefits for members, as well as a Juvenile Department that organized baseball and football games for at-risk youth. The organization offered various related activities, including aid to children with disabilities, scholarships, and even an Italian Old People's Home. It also served as an unofficial liaison between the authorities and the community, and settling disputes among parties who didn't want official help -- such as extortion victims targeted by the notorious Black Hand Gang. 

The Unione also supported local political candidates and various causes, such as campaigns against the Black Hand. However, as the 1920s dawned, the Chicago chapter fell under a darker influence, once gangsters realized its importance to the Italian-American vote. The Unione's community origins also offered an ideal haven for criminal activity, once the relevant faction installed its puppet of choice as president.

This state of affairs naturally aroused fierce power struggles among the Windy City's dominant gangster, Al Capone, and his rivals. Between 1921 and 1930, six of the Chicago chapter's seven presidents were murdered The sole exception was Mike Merlo, due to his early death by cancer at 44, in 1924. Only Merlo and Pasqualino "Patsy" Lolordo survived any appreciable length of time, at three years apiece. 

Five presidents held their titles for one or two years, while one (Samuzzo "Samoots" Ammatuna) lasted barely six months before his own murder on November 10, 1925. By then, the organization had renamed itself the Italian-American National Union, as a way to attract Italian-Americans from other regions of their homeland -- and to try and shed the stigma associated with its previous moniker, presumably, though I doubt the press complied.

The Unione restructured as a fraternal life insurance organization in 1937. Over time,  the organization that had once been a lazy headline writer's dream in the Roaring Twenties faded into irrelevance, as its membership and influence declined. Its story ended in 1991, after merging with the Italian Sons and Daughters of America Fraternal Association.

None of this is to suggest that Amazon, nor its founder, are involved in this kind of activity. The basic point is that some people always roll the dice, no matter the circumstances. As several Capone biographers have noted, for those willing to pursue them, the emoluments associated with the Unione presidency simply proved too tempting to pass up, even if it meant a one-way ticket to the morgue.

However, in Amazon's case, the 150% turnover suggests a fundamentally rotten corporate culture that goes beyond basic union busting, or the well-documented conditions at its warehouses. That figure indicates an unwillingness to view workers as anything but mere chess pieces, to push around at will, all in its relentless pursuit of profits. 

Now that Amazon's burn-through approach seems to be catching up with them, it's not our responsibility to save them from themselves -- which taking any of their jobs would mean, especially with Bezos so busy turning off the lights at his flagship newspaper. the Washington Post. (Though I suspect that he'll regret the $40 million he's reportedly dumping into Amazon's Melania Trump documentary -- especially after the bloom starts peeling off her husband's political rose.)

Obviously, everyone has their own choices to make about what types of seek out, or take on. The same goes for Amazon's online ordering, which requires a rewrite of Hamlet's famous soliloquy: "To use or not to use -- that is the question."  But we should always  stay mindful of those issues in dealing with Amazon, or any of its "Frightful Five" brethren (Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft).

For all of these reasons, I'm giving the idea of working for Amazon a miss. And honestly, so should you. Which is also why -- now that it's served its purpose, as fodder for this post -- I'm chucking their latest propaganda straight into the bin. --The Reckoner


Links To Go (Democracy Dies In Bezos):
NPR: How Five Tech Giants

Paul Krugman Substack (Karen Attiah Interview):
https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/karen-attiah

Reddit: Is Anyone Concerned About Amazon Employee Turnover Rate?:
https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1aw20uf/is_anyone_concerned_about_amazon_employee/

Sex Pistols: Here We Go Again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETcXCgS788M

World Socialist Worker: Amazon Response To Labor Shortage...:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/01/25/amzn-j25.html



>"Duty Now (?) For The Future"/The Reckoner<

Sunday, September 28, 2025

A "Woke Words" List? Another Neoliberal Bad Joke

<"Our Work Here Is Done..."/The Reckoner>

<i.>
Hijacking language is an old, old game, one that the far right has played supremely well, sadly, to advance its interests One of the more obvious examples is the Orwelllian renaming of entities with opposite intentions, like the Alliance Defending Freedom. It's a noble-sounding moniker, presumably chosen to conjure images of the Boston Tea Party, Patrick Henry, and the like. In reality, the only freedoms that the ADF ever defends are those of Christian nationalists. 

For examples, see the 303 Creative case, in which a web designer  successfully argued for the right to turn away gay customers on free speech grounds, even though none had ever sought her services. The hypothetical nightmare that gay and lesbian hordes might gatecrash her website any moment was sufficient to swing down the gavel in her favor. The 303 Creative ruling carried on the dark path opened by its cousin (Masterpiece Cakeshop), where a majority of good people convinced themselves that a sterling compromise had been struck -- rather than the greasy carveout to the Christian right that it actually represented.

Another example is the weaponizing of the term "woke," which actually originated in Black culture. The earliest reference comes from "Scottsboro Blues," a 1938 recording by Lead Belly, who urges listeners to "stay woke, keep their eyes open" for potential dangers -- like those the nine teenagers faced in the Scottsboro case. The term became a byword for "being well-informed" or "politically aware," as seem in works like If You're Woke, You Dig It (1962), a novel that sent up white beatniks' appropriation of Black slang -- or the play, Garvey Lives! (1972), in which a character vows to "stay woke," to liberate other Black people. Knowing these examples makes the W-word's current ill-begotten appropriation by the likes of Trump and his clique all the more distressing.

Now comes another variation, of words you can't say, or shouldn't use -- as seen in the so-called "45 Woke Words" list recently proposed by Third Way, of terms for candidates to avoid on the stump this year. The idea is for them to "stop talking like they're leading a seminar at Antioch," claims executive vice president of public affairs Matt Bennett. "We think language is one of the central problems we face with normie voters, signaling that we are out of touch with how they live, think and talk."

The list proposes six categories of no-no language -- think of it as the political version of the late George Carlin's monologue, "The Seven Words You Can't Say On Television" -- to avoid using. The suggested categories cover crime ("incarcerated people," "involuntary confinement," "justice-involved"), gender ("birthing person,” “heteronormative,” “cisgender,” “deadnaming,” “LGBTQIA+"), "organizer jargon" ("barriers to participation," "food insecurity," "stakeholders," "the unhoused"), race ("allyship," "BIPOC," intersectionality," "Latinx"), "seminar room language" ("cultural appropriation," "Overton window," "systems of oppression"), and "therapy speak" ("microaggression," "othering," "privilege").

Even terms that seem closer to creative license are deemed off-limits, such as "existential threat" -- whether to our climate, planet, or democracy itself. Never mind that the general consensus, among those without some special interest axe to grind, suggests that we're moved long past the initial stage of general concern, to code red alarm. Try selling that one to island nations endangered by rising water levels -- like the Maldives, or Vanuatu -- and see how far soft-pedaling catastrophe gets you.


<"Words To The (Not-So) Wise"/The Reckoner>


<ii.>
Suffice to say, this approach begets numerous problems, starting with its source. Third Way emerged in 2005, billing itself as a champion of "moderate policy and political ideas." The trouble is that it's funded by corporate interests, ranging from Amgen, to CVS Health, Facebook, PG&E, Qualcomm, and so on (see link below) -- the same-old, same-old unholy alliance of players, all dedicated to keeping the status quo frozen in place. 

Most of Third Way's key players are the same faces recycled from previous Democratic administrations -- like Bennett, who served as a deputy assistant to President Clinton -- who further distinguish themselves via utter hostility to progressive ideas like Medicare for All (see below), or the apparently quaint notion that greed should have some kind of an upper limit. 

Instead of government intervention, Third Way's preferred solutions for our present ills lean toward a blending of social liberalism and old school Main Street capitalism. In other words, gay couples can stay married, and smoke pot in the privacy of their own home. They just shouldn't expect affordable housing, clean air and drinking water, non-corporatized healthcare, nor non-discriminatory lending policies.

In Third Way's view, that business is best left to the market -- that is, the same handful of corporate initials that long ago cornered it -- who will finally do the right thing, once their own "Eureka!" moment finally arrives. How, we're never told; presumably, after Jacob Marley's ghost comes knocking. or the modern version, perhaps (amid some interminable solo at a Dave Matthews Band show, causing the ponytailed Boomer to wax in anguish over the results).

Stranger still, some of the words on Third Way's no-no list have actually been used by far right figures like the notorious Leonard Leo, who's freely invoked the "Overton window" metaphor as ample justification for his ongoing court capture project.

Other suspect words seem long, yet do accurately describe the issue, as we see from a quick look at the Oxford Dictionary definitions of "heteronormative" ("denoting or relating to a world view that presents gender roles as fixed, and heterosexuality as the normal or preferred sexual orientation"), or "incarcerated," for instance ("imprisoned or confined"). What's Third Way playing at here, exactly? If predatory corporations are people, too, why can't the inmates they stack up like cord wood enjoy the same status?

Most distressing of all, however, is the "organizer jargon" category, which seems bent on relegating the most marginalized to the scrapheap. As someone who has experienced hunger personally -- and gone to extraordinary lengths to relieve it, like selling artwork, musical equipment, and rock memorabilia, to raise the capital needed to pay the corporate groceries' greedflated prices -- I cannot abide the idea of avoiding the subject.

Food insecurity, whether Bennett and his denizens like it or not, is a reality for an estimated 47.4 millions Americans, including 13.8 million children. Not talking about it to curry favor with corporate donors or unsympathetic voters is simply unconscionable. The same goes for Third Way's desire to avoid the issue of homelessness, via "unhoused," despite rampant levels of inequality. Which naturally begs the question, how do you slap a positive spin on starvation? Call it "food purchase opportunity," or "involuntary fast," perhaps?

After all, manipulators like Mr. Bennett and his fellow pundits -- that's basically a term for anyone who can't get a real job, remember -- have never experienced the joys of juggling multiple jobs to make extortionate rents. Excluding "barriers to participation" feels equally troublesome, since it's a term that accurately describes what so many millions are expected to swallow every day -- not enough money. Not enough resources. Not enough time. Not enough work.

As my subhead suggests, this whole exercise in linguistic futility -- which I can't imagine anyone but a corporate neoliberal embracing -- feels like a bad joke, or ample fodder for late night comedians, except that they mean it. They're serious. And they're determined to fool enough people into embracing whatever their corporate masters are pushing, is which what makes most think tanks such noxious entities. 

All the more reason to push back all the harder, away from the air-conditioned suites they inhabit so naturally, yet deny so freely, to those who cannot pay triple-digit utility bills. But while we're on the subject, let's also push back against liberals and moderates who failed to push back themselves, against the weaponization of "woke," or any of those other MAGA-era greatest hits ("fake news," "lawfare," "Let's Go, Brandon," and so on).

That failure to push back reflects a lack of moral clarity that any opposition, no matter how beleaguered it may feel, is obliged to provide -- which, in turns, helps fuel the drumbeat of a new vocabulary, one that feels more in tune with the times (as opposed to the endless invocations of "the long arc," and "making good trouble," perhaps).

The emergence of a more timely vocabulary may possibly even give Third Way some pause, especially if more progressive candidates continue to win elections. But even without that natural check and balance, Third Way's so-called "Woke List" is doomed to fail -- for two reasons to which I keep returning, via two quotes from the late activist lesbian poet, Audre Lord, the first one being:

"Your silence 
will not protect you."

And then, last but not least, this quote, the most pertinent one here, by a country mile:

<"The master's tools 
will never dismantle 
the master's house.">


A simple point, isn't it, one that eludes most overeducated neoliberals and their fan followings, who never grasped one of punk rock's most enduring principles ("If you're going to be simple, be as simple as you can").  In other words, maybe if you offered more than the usual downbeat messages -- "This is the best we can get," or, "We're not as bad as them" -- then voters might actually respond. Food for thought, isn't it? --The Reckoner


Links To Go (And Remember,
You Can't Always Have It Both Ways...):

NPR: What Does The Word "Woke" Really Mean,
And Where Does It Come From?:

https://www.npr.org/2023/07/19/1188543449/what-does-the-word-woke-really-mean-and-where-does-it-come-from

PR Watch: Centrist Third Way...
Attacks Sanders In Iowa:
https://www.prwatch.org/news/2020/01/13535/centrist-third-way-funded-corporate-interests-attacks-sanders-iowa

Yahoo News: 45 Words And Phrases